To explain this statement I to allow a clear approach to the concepts behind it. It would be logical to let the roof on an expression or statement without undressing to show their foundation and structure, at least in which I support. In this sense, there are two keywords that determine very different positions and, in turn, are conflicting, hence the inclusion of the word vaccine as an example of the influence of one over another. These are: Alienation and freethinking.
language SAR defines alienation as "The process by which an individual or a collective consciousness to transform it contradicts what was expected from his condition." Wikipedia states that "The alienation or transfer is the phenomenon of suppressing the personality, depriving the individual of his personality or break an individual's personality, controlling and overriding their free will to make the person dependent on what dictated by another person or organization. " In any case, highlight the reference to the cancellation of free will as one of the fundamental points that are opposed to free thought. Referred to Freethought
the same SAR, identifies with, "Doctrine that calls for the individual right to complete independence of any criterion supernatural." Wikipedia, for continuing with the two basic sources from which I nurtured it, describes it: "The term freethought from the Enlightenment defines a philosophical attitude consistent in rejecting any dogmatism, either of a religious or any other class, and rely on reason to distinguish the true from the false. For this rejection religious dogma among freethinkers find Masons, atheists , agnostics, deists and rationalist . There are close relationships between words and terms freethought skepticism and secularism . However, a precise definition should be sought in the origin history of revolutionary thought that led to the French Revolution . Freethought is a philosophical basis for the movement of secular humanism . It is also the educational and philosophical basis for rationalist school. "I leave the links activated if someone is in the interest of expanding your practice.
view of the above could ask if there is freedom and the ability of freethinkers. It is clear that thinking does exist, but I'm not so sure that there is of freethinkers. Without going into the appeal to the intuitive knowledge, or that knowledge acquired without the study, innate, it is true that every intelligent develops their knowledge and belief, personality, principles and values \u200b\u200bthroughout their lives according to their own experiences and their ability to compute, analyze and conclude results within the society they live, through the process of learning, socialization and cultural integration, which has its roots in indoctrination. Arguably, therefore, that the learning process aims to channel and structure a system of thought influenced by the values \u200b\u200band principles that underpin the society. Therefore, we would be halfway between the submission of a modulated thinking and the tendency to free thinking that every human being as a way to understand and understand their environment.
Free will, critical thinking, doubt and the search for alternatives through observation, study and research or other improvement approaches are the basis for development, both individual and social evolution, while rationality is the support where it is based on logical understanding.
alienation in the spoils of free will, coming to lose one's personality and delegate to another the ability to decide on something and accept your opinion or approach as incontestable, either by recognition of their authority on the subject, either by ideological submission or own religious faith by, among others ... So there are things that, being irrational, the irrefutable because they assume as framed on principles, dogmas and beliefs that we inoculated at the time. Is what I transcribed definition reflects: "transform your consciousness until it contradicts what was expected of her condition, in this case freethinker.
The goal of any society based on the exercise of power, ie the existence of the authority and the asymmetry tends to instill principles and values \u200b\u200bthat control alienating the freedom of critical thought and therefore harmful and detrimental to the social structure. What better than some religious dogmas, precepts and beliefs from a Higher Being or the state itself, which is the foremost authority on things, to implement and maintain a "status quo" endorsed by it. This ensures the control of the situation, the maintenance of asymmetry and domination and power over people and things. The alienated, I gather, tend to neutralize their cognitive dissonance between what emanates from his reason rationally and what is given or imposed by conformity, waiving their own criteria, and submission to the authority recognized by it. Inside stifle the free-thinking in all of us to avoid internal conflict, resulting in a state of consciousness affordable and adapted to the alienating environment.
In this regard I refer to four types of social alienation:
Religious: resigned to a dogma and justifying the dedication of the dogma that frustrates the development of individualized human consciousness.
Politics: It belongs to the State, or consent to the exploitation and oppression by a government. Economic
: in which the products or man-made media dominate the individual.
Consumerism buy advertising dictates that no rational assessment of the usefulness of the product, identifying happiness with the mere consumption.
The Freethinker, meanwhile, look at things rationally, the question is your free guide and conclusions object. Do not get carried away by irrational dogmas, by distorting conditions or impositions, but by reasoned convictions from their free will, since his powers of observation and analysis, from his eternal questioning of things, to go ever further in his knowledge.
For me, one of the objectives is to scrutinize free-thinking in itself to develop the spiral of their potential. Each has a capacity to be managed. It is as if each one gave him a few resources to manage and had to learn to use and take out the most. But if you do not warn you find on the road, to individuals who want to safeguard their property and take advantage of it to their advantage, making him see that it does for their sake, may fall into the subtle trap of the cunning ruler, shepherd and savior approach him and give their resources, in this case, freethinker.
therefore free thought is the result of a process of confrontation with the educational system, rational criticism of rebellion, claims the quality of free thinking, autonomy of management principles and values \u200b\u200bbased on responsibility and to primary objective of promoting self-development and self as human beings, including the field of intellectual knowledge and symbiosis with the environment that sustains and nourishes us, to lead to improvement and perpetuation of the species in equilibrium with the ecosystem, otherwise we will be digging their own grave in the medium long term. This is, in my view, the object of rational man in his existence, but there are nuances that, under their own survival instincts, are distorted and irrational behavior oriented. That is, myopic behavior that only seek the good of one or a few at the expense of an entire community, including other species, without realizing that exterminating go indirectly to the human species, and to maintain socially necessary alienation of the affected groups.
conclude that blocks the free alienation of the human being, while the free-thinking helps in this development was the meeting with their potential that will lead to comprehensive development. Therefore, vacunémonos against alienation through the use of free thought, assuming the responsibility that it follows. Flee from religious dogmas, political and any other source and open mind to the nutrients that give us life and the existence of so many different sources, by those responsible for food digestion of the intellect. Finally, I make a call to the secular or secular humanism as a philosophy of life and form to improve the human condition.
0 comments:
Post a Comment