understand the structural model posed, with which I disagree, for the family, and marriage in particular, can be formed by persons of the same or opposite sex, in my point of view. The mortar that binds them together is love and that's a personal experience that must be assessed for members, and the desire to live and develop personally and intellectually supported on each other or the other, although there are nuances that tell me the relational conception of the churches to justify their relationship, and understanding based on love and sacrifice surrender and give up many things for the other, when what they propose is a tendency to self through an alliance of personal freedom and independence convergence between the parties. The sacrifice and renunciation is an issue that ultimately, or create a Stockholm Syndrome or just overlapping conflicts and hatreds that transcends their own living, in any case we will refer you to share and exchange these efforts and sacrifices by mutual agreement when you make them. Even here we talk about sex or gender, but of interpersonal feelings between two or more people that make up the family. On the other hand, the system role, although I have very clear that define the church officials, should be based on equality and consensus must be functional and the result of a settling process and consent between the parties. In this last case I can only doubt whether a misogynist and homophobic institution, at least from the standpoint of the concrete structure and role of women in it, you can pursue my own ideas about it and not be influenced by the trend towards women marginal and homosexuality that characterizes them in his approach.
There is another line, the indissoluble marriage posed, which clashes with the personal evolutionary process of each of the parties and the relationship itself. You know what you want and need today, but not what they need and want tomorrow. Therefore any such commitment lacks the vision and acceptance of change has to be done in the process of life development. Not everyone makes the way of life at the same rate, personal development is not always parallel and convergent and divergent fitting a mismatch that prevents healthy living and requires a break to allow everyone to continue their own lives and the way they understand. When a marriage has gone from being allies and supports personal development and have become brakes or hindrances to it, breaking it only if there is no redefinition reconduzca the situation, and that's hard to get. Draws attention, also, that Jesus Christ himself asked them to leave their Apostel everything, including his family and follow him, perhaps intended So, personal development from the freedom and independence. It remains to be inconsistent with current approaches the church for his parishioners, while the clergy seem to assume that slogan celibate in their own flesh.
Regarding the idea of \u200b\u200bindissoluble, "till death do us part" fit attitudinal considerations that determine a subconscious emotions, desires and behaviors. If you understand that marriage is valid until death do us part and a separation is presented by a party, may include levels of the unconscious, that deserves the death warrant for wanting to separate and break the contract and the divine mandate sacrament of marriage, which signed on its promise of marriage, for death is the only cause that can dissolve. That, in principle, could be a tricky issue for debate and a certain depth, I leave the interpretation Lacanian psychoanalytic theorists who have much to say about it since its correlation with the language of the unconscious. Delving
something else, would make reference to demonstrations of Bishop Reig Pla, Bishop of Alcalá and chairman of the Subcommittee on Family and Life of the English Episcopal Conference, which recently declared that "marriages are less likely canonically constituted the domestic violence who are partners in fact. " In an article published in El Pais , Juan Jose Tamayo, director of the Department of Theology and Sciences of Religions at the University Carlos III of Madrid and author of Religion, gender and violence (Seville, 2010), is to argue that in Catholic marriages are more prone to domestic violence than cohabiting couples in the survival precisely in those of the patriarchal structure and the imposition of indissolubility, which eventually, become a source of abuse against women and children. It is an interesting look at some provisions derived from letters to the Corinthians, Ephesians and Galatians, which highlight the inconsistency arising in its consideration of religion with the woman, which means second-order and submissive to men in the first two and on an equal footing in the third.
Returning to the subject's role within this relational aspect, there is a point which I think essential. The role model is a unique result in each case or family situation, or should be. As I mentioned, is the product of continuous cohabitation, where there are tacit agreements that comply with the time and the distribution and acceptance of the potential, knowledge and skills of individual family members, for the sake of better performance or benefit to all members, without ignoring the personality of each of the members, their character and temperament, on par with his background in the family setting of provenance. Therefore, it is something dynamic, which becomes a greater or lesser extent depending on the circumstances that will exist for and at the same time, overlapping product of a negotiation that is redefining the relationship. No two marriages are alike and the family microculture is unique to each case. Two subjects from different families with different microcultures agree to form a family unit and as a result, there is another family microculture own, by contrasting the two models and the assimilation and development of derivative coexistence del amor, al menos inicialmente.
No quiero terminar si aludir al concepto de “paternidad responsable” que he mencionado anteriormente. Este concepto tiene, para mí, varias dimensiones significativas. Por un lado está el compromiso que se adquiere cuando se tiene un hijo, para procurar su desarrollo personal y llevarle a la madurez con garantías. Ese compromiso te obliga a considerar tus recursos y posibilidades para determinar responsablemente el número adecuado de hijos. Por otro lado, está la obligación que contraes, junto a tu pareja, para llevar a término esa función conjunta, por lo que cualquier separación o conflicto relacional debería considerar la influencia que pudiera tener en la evolución children, and to neutralize the evil in a responsible manner. There is also the role and its duty to fairly and responsibly run, providing nutrients effort and physical, intellectual and spiritual required for each of the parties.
Therefore, by way of conclusion, the family is an entity that falls largely on the members that the form from their free will and who escapes to a large extent, employers legally established, as is an agreement mutual coexistence which has a uniquely dynamic and evolutionary respectable, as any civil society can impose, by law, make someone do something against their will, barring exceptional circumstances that affect the benefit or detriment of others. In this sense we can see structured families without going through the vicarage or civil registration as a result of the free will of its members. Indeed, a Catholic marriage, for instance, should not be compelled by civil laws, a separated or divorced, unless there is a bad deal by the middle or final request of any of the parties to cease cohabitation, leaving his conscientious decision-making, can not be forced to use a condom or get an abortion, ie an action that goes against their religious principles, but I do claim that it may prohibit exercise any action that runs against the principles or laws of society, but his religion for protection. At the same time, religion, speaking, pastors or dogmatizes for its believers, must respect the idiosyncrasies of others and their rules and laws apply only to its members, without interfering in the decisions of civil society that is more diverse and plural, and that she has a legal system of government established from the plurality.
Finally, I understand that the family has a social role, a role of indoctrination and cultural socialization of children, at the same time a prominent role in the educational process and help develop the potential of each and every one of members, mainly of children, perhaps for that reason is in continuing crisis, as is any society in the process of evolution, because the crisis is not bad when it is a product of growth, but the solutions given to problems that may be proposing to her. My concern is not the family itself, but its ability to adapt to changing times and adapt to the development of freedom and autonomy in a different society where man is freer, more capable and more mature, where the units are symmetrical and the asymmetry is not maintained that characterizes us.
There is another line, the indissoluble marriage posed, which clashes with the personal evolutionary process of each of the parties and the relationship itself. You know what you want and need today, but not what they need and want tomorrow. Therefore any such commitment lacks the vision and acceptance of change has to be done in the process of life development. Not everyone makes the way of life at the same rate, personal development is not always parallel and convergent and divergent fitting a mismatch that prevents healthy living and requires a break to allow everyone to continue their own lives and the way they understand. When a marriage has gone from being allies and supports personal development and have become brakes or hindrances to it, breaking it only if there is no redefinition reconduzca the situation, and that's hard to get. Draws attention, also, that Jesus Christ himself asked them to leave their Apostel everything, including his family and follow him, perhaps intended So, personal development from the freedom and independence. It remains to be inconsistent with current approaches the church for his parishioners, while the clergy seem to assume that slogan celibate in their own flesh.
Regarding the idea of \u200b\u200bindissoluble, "till death do us part" fit attitudinal considerations that determine a subconscious emotions, desires and behaviors. If you understand that marriage is valid until death do us part and a separation is presented by a party, may include levels of the unconscious, that deserves the death warrant for wanting to separate and break the contract and the divine mandate sacrament of marriage, which signed on its promise of marriage, for death is the only cause that can dissolve. That, in principle, could be a tricky issue for debate and a certain depth, I leave the interpretation Lacanian psychoanalytic theorists who have much to say about it since its correlation with the language of the unconscious. Delving
something else, would make reference to demonstrations of Bishop Reig Pla, Bishop of Alcalá and chairman of the Subcommittee on Family and Life of the English Episcopal Conference, which recently declared that "marriages are less likely canonically constituted the domestic violence who are partners in fact. " In an article published in El Pais , Juan Jose Tamayo, director of the Department of Theology and Sciences of Religions at the University Carlos III of Madrid and author of Religion, gender and violence (Seville, 2010), is to argue that in Catholic marriages are more prone to domestic violence than cohabiting couples in the survival precisely in those of the patriarchal structure and the imposition of indissolubility, which eventually, become a source of abuse against women and children. It is an interesting look at some provisions derived from letters to the Corinthians, Ephesians and Galatians, which highlight the inconsistency arising in its consideration of religion with the woman, which means second-order and submissive to men in the first two and on an equal footing in the third.
Returning to the subject's role within this relational aspect, there is a point which I think essential. The role model is a unique result in each case or family situation, or should be. As I mentioned, is the product of continuous cohabitation, where there are tacit agreements that comply with the time and the distribution and acceptance of the potential, knowledge and skills of individual family members, for the sake of better performance or benefit to all members, without ignoring the personality of each of the members, their character and temperament, on par with his background in the family setting of provenance. Therefore, it is something dynamic, which becomes a greater or lesser extent depending on the circumstances that will exist for and at the same time, overlapping product of a negotiation that is redefining the relationship. No two marriages are alike and the family microculture is unique to each case. Two subjects from different families with different microcultures agree to form a family unit and as a result, there is another family microculture own, by contrasting the two models and the assimilation and development of derivative coexistence del amor, al menos inicialmente.
No quiero terminar si aludir al concepto de “paternidad responsable” que he mencionado anteriormente. Este concepto tiene, para mí, varias dimensiones significativas. Por un lado está el compromiso que se adquiere cuando se tiene un hijo, para procurar su desarrollo personal y llevarle a la madurez con garantías. Ese compromiso te obliga a considerar tus recursos y posibilidades para determinar responsablemente el número adecuado de hijos. Por otro lado, está la obligación que contraes, junto a tu pareja, para llevar a término esa función conjunta, por lo que cualquier separación o conflicto relacional debería considerar la influencia que pudiera tener en la evolución children, and to neutralize the evil in a responsible manner. There is also the role and its duty to fairly and responsibly run, providing nutrients effort and physical, intellectual and spiritual required for each of the parties.
Therefore, by way of conclusion, the family is an entity that falls largely on the members that the form from their free will and who escapes to a large extent, employers legally established, as is an agreement mutual coexistence which has a uniquely dynamic and evolutionary respectable, as any civil society can impose, by law, make someone do something against their will, barring exceptional circumstances that affect the benefit or detriment of others. In this sense we can see structured families without going through the vicarage or civil registration as a result of the free will of its members. Indeed, a Catholic marriage, for instance, should not be compelled by civil laws, a separated or divorced, unless there is a bad deal by the middle or final request of any of the parties to cease cohabitation, leaving his conscientious decision-making, can not be forced to use a condom or get an abortion, ie an action that goes against their religious principles, but I do claim that it may prohibit exercise any action that runs against the principles or laws of society, but his religion for protection. At the same time, religion, speaking, pastors or dogmatizes for its believers, must respect the idiosyncrasies of others and their rules and laws apply only to its members, without interfering in the decisions of civil society that is more diverse and plural, and that she has a legal system of government established from the plurality.
Finally, I understand that the family has a social role, a role of indoctrination and cultural socialization of children, at the same time a prominent role in the educational process and help develop the potential of each and every one of members, mainly of children, perhaps for that reason is in continuing crisis, as is any society in the process of evolution, because the crisis is not bad when it is a product of growth, but the solutions given to problems that may be proposing to her. My concern is not the family itself, but its ability to adapt to changing times and adapt to the development of freedom and autonomy in a different society where man is freer, more capable and more mature, where the units are symmetrical and the asymmetry is not maintained that characterizes us.
0 comments:
Post a Comment